Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:51:09AM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> And if you look at the OMAP's MPU irq_chip implementation, these are >> not populated either. We rely on the default lazy enable via unmask >> and the lazy disable. > > There's no lazy enable - it's immediate. There's only lazy disable. Correct, that was a mis-edit. It should've read: "We rely on the default enable via unmask and the lazy disable." Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
