On 2/21/20 4:47 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 08:09:16PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> On 2/18/20 7:48 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 07:35:47PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>> On 2/18/20 7:21 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:28:25PM +0900, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/17/20 10:38 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>>>>>>> If the gpios are probed after this driver (e.g. if they
>>>>>>> come from an i2c expander) there is no need to print an
>>>>>>> error message.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> index edc5016f46f1..cea58d0cb457 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-palmas.c
>>>>>>> @@ -205,14 +205,18 @@ static int palmas_usb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> palmas_usb->id_gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "id",
>>>>>>> GPIOD_IN);
>>>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod)) {
>>>>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(palmas_usb->id_gpiod) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
>>>>>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>
>>> Here we returned...
>>
>> hmm. you better to suggest the result of cocci script
>> to understand why it is matter.
>
> You can browse similar fixes online :)
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/log/?qt=grep&q=else+after+return
>
As you commented, please share the result
of cocci or checkpatch warning. It is simple to finish
this discussion.
As I commented on other reply,
"I think that my suggestion is better because 'if' and 'else if'
check the error state of same 'palmas_usb->id_gpiod' variable.
If 'if' and 'else if' checks the different variable,
your suggestion is better."
--
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics
