Re: [ARM][OMAP] TWL4030 IRQ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 09:04:53PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> Russell,
> Just a question here.
> 
> In the enable_irq(irq) and disable_irq(irq) call tree, internally there are calls to 
> the interrupt controller chip.
> 
> In disable_irq() path:
> 	desc->chip->disable(irq);
> And in emable_irq() path:
> 	desc->chip->enable(irq);
> 
> But the in gic gic_chip, enable/disable fn are not populated.

There are defaults for these.  The enable method will call the unmask
method.  Disabling of ARM IRQs has always been lazy, and this is no
different here.

> Do we need these(disable/enable) hooks in gic_chip as well ?

No.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux