v4l2_int_device vs v4l2_subdev?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Still trying to wrap my head around the OMAP/34xx camera support.
I need to use the TVP5150 sensor/controller, but the existing
driver uses v4l_subdev.  The "working" examples I've found
(from Sergio's tree) use sensors like ov3640 with uses v4l2_int_device

Are these two totally separate beasts?
If I have an infrastructure (I assume) based on v4l2_int_device,
how do I use a v4l2_subdev device driver?  or need I move one to
the other?

... dizzy from traveling down too many twisty little passages :-(

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux