On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 10:19 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > > * deffo@xxxxxx <deffo@xxxxxx> [191127 13:53]: > > hi there! > > > > i'm using the TI OMAP4460 (VAR-SOM-OM44) and i get several errors in dmesg on the latest for-next branch: > > > > root@localhost:~# dmesg -l err > > [ 1.146026] twl: not initialized > > [ 1.146087] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146087] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146179] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146209] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146270] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146301] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1375000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.146331] twl6030_uv_to_vsel:OUT OF RANGE! non mapped vsel for 1410000 Vs max 1316660 > > [ 1.522979] omap_dm_timer_set_source: timer_sys_ck not found > > Sounds like something needs fixing for sure. Similar messages seem to > appear for all omap4 with twl PMIC. Something similar happened to the twl4030 on omap3. Check out the fix for it: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11094653/ It't not exactly the same, but It might be useful in fixing the twl6030. adam > > > which probably leads to the problem, that the cpu cannot run with more than 920 mhz. is this a known problem? > > Yes, see the drivers/cpufreq changes recently done for omap3: > > $ git log v5.4..3fbeef397212046cc514fe9fcd07e67e6ca32163 drivers/cpufreq > > Similar changes are also needed for omap4 to detect the supported rates. > > And then we also need to add a regulator controller driver for cpufreq > to use that manages the voltage controller. > > > i need to run the cpus with 1.5 ghz, as it was possible with the v3.4 kernel, how is this possible? > > My guess is that v3.4 was missing some critical checks to protect > the SoC :) But please do check, maybe we're missing some code that > was there earlier. > > Regards, > > Tony
