Re: [PATCHv2 00/15] Remoteproc: updates for OMAP remoteproc support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 10:31, Mathieu Poirier
<mathieu.poirier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2019 at 07:17, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is v2 of the series [1], addressing comments from Bjorn and Rob.
> > Bindings patch is funnily v2.5, as I posted v2 already and wanted to
> > keep this somehow in sync. Individual patches contain comments about the
> > changes, or Reviewed-by tags provided if there are no changes.
> >
> > I also dropped the conversion patch to SPDX licensing until I can
> > confirm the license we want to use. Lets just keep the existing in place
> > until that.
> >
> > This series still depends on the reset + clock patches posted earlier,
> > but both of those dependencies are in linux-next now.
>
> I tried to apply your set to today's linux-next (next-20191119) but it
> fails at patch 13.

Digging further into this patch 12 is causing problem on next-20191119 (not 13):

mpoirier@xps15:~/work/remoteproc/kernel-review$ git apply --reject
0012-remoteproc-omap-add-support-for-system-suspend-resum.patch
Checking patch drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c...
Hunk #3 succeeded at 85 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 99 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 359 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 544 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #7 succeeded at 952 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #8 succeeded at 992 (offset -2 lines).
Checking patch drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h...
error: while searching for:
/*
 * Remote processor messaging
 *
 * Copyright (C) 2011 Texas Instruments, Inc.
 * Copyright (C) 2011 Google, Inc.
 * All rights reserved.
 */

error: patch failed: drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h:2
Hunk #2 succeeded at 57 (offset 25 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 80 (offset 25 lines).
Applied patch drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c cleanly.
Applying patch drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.h with 1 reject...
Rejected hunk #1.
Hunk #2 applied cleanly.
Hunk #3 applied cleanly.

Your patch expects the last line of the first hunk to be '*/' but it
is '*' in linux-next.

>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > -Tero
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11215421/
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux