On Mon 28 Oct 05:42 PDT 2019, Tero Kristo wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/omap_remoteproc.c
[..]
> +static int omap_rproc_get_boot_data(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> + struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> + struct omap_rproc *oproc = rproc->priv;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!of_device_is_compatible(np, "ti,omap4-dsp") &&
> + !of_device_is_compatible(np, "ti,omap5-dsp"))
> + return 0;
I think it would be cleaner if you added a "has_bootreg" bool to your
omap_rproc_dev_data, do of_device_get_match_data() in omap_rproc_probe()
and pass that here.
> +
> + oproc->boot_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*oproc->boot_data),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!oproc->boot_data)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (!of_property_read_bool(np, "syscon-bootreg")) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "syscon-bootreg property is missing\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + oproc->boot_data->syscon =
> + syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "syscon-bootreg");
You updated the dt binding document, but this needs to be updated as
well.
Regards,
Bjorn
