Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on Tue [2019-Oct-22 08:44:46 -0700]:
> * Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx> [191018 15:46]:
> > Add device nodes for CSI2 camera board OV5640.
> > Add the CAL port nodes with the necessary linkage to the ov5640 nodes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Benoit Parrot <bparrot@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-common.dtsi | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-common.dtsi
> > index 8641a3d7d8ad..e4c01a67f6de 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-common.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/dra72-evm-common.dtsi
> > @@ -187,6 +187,12 @@
> > gpio = <&gpio5 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > enable-active-high;
> > };
> > +
> > + clk_ov5640_fixed: clk_ov5640_fixed {
> > + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> > + #clock-cells = <0>;
> > + clock-frequency = <24000000>;
> > + };
> > };
>
> The clock node name should be generic and not use
> undescores. If there is a hidden dependency to the
> clock node name here, it should be mentioned in the
> patch for the non-standard use.
Not sure what you mean by generic, here.
This is just to provide a "clock" node which gives the "value" of the fixed
oscillator frequency so driver can get to it, the actual name does not
matter.
Benoit
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
