* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191021 17:08]: > > > Am 21.10.2019 um 16:30 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > > > > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [191019 18:43]: > >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile > >> @@ -216,7 +216,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_NOKIA_N8X0) += board-n8x0.o > >> > >> # Platform specific device init code > >> > >> -omap-hsmmc-$(CONFIG_MMC_OMAP_HS) := hsmmc.o > >> obj-y += $(omap-hsmmc-m) $(omap-hsmmc-y) > > > > The related obj-y line can go now too, right? > > Yes, I think so. It is a construction that I have never seen before :) > Therefore I did not recognize that it is related. > > > And looks like common.h also has struct omap2_hsmmc_info > > so maybe check by grepping for hsmmc_info to see it's gone. > > Yes, it is just a forward-declaration of the struct name with > no user anywhere. > > Scheduled for v3. > > BTW: should this series go through your tree since it is an > omap machine? Or MMC tree as that's where the code change really are. Regards, Tony
