Re: [PATCH 2/8] ARM: OMAP2+: Drop bogus wkup domain oswr setting

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> [191013 15:08]:
> Hi!
> 
> > The wkup domain is always on and does not have logic off setting. This
> > got accidentally added by commit f74297dd9354 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Make sure
> > LOGICRETSTATE bits are not cleared") but is harmless.
> > 
> > Cc: Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c | 3 +--
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm44xx.c
> > @@ -137,8 +137,7 @@ static int __init pwrdms_setup(struct powerdomain *pwrdm, void *unused)
> >  	 * smsc911x at least if per hits retention during idle.
> >  	 */
> >  	if (!strncmp(pwrdm->name, "core", 4) ||
> > -	    !strncmp(pwrdm->name, "l4per", 5) ||
> > -	    !strncmp(pwrdm->name, "wkup", 4))
> > +	    !strncmp(pwrdm->name, "l4per", 5))
> >  		pwrdm_set_logic_retst(pwrdm, PWRDM_POWER_RET);
> 
> This is rather theoretical, but if the powerdomain is called
> "corelation-not-causation", do you still want the if() to trigger?

No need to if no writable register bits exists if I understand
your theoretical comment right :)

Regards,

Tony



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux