On 13-09-19, 00:33, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > On 12/09/2019 23:19, Adam Ford wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 4:12 PM Daniel Lezcano > > <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> On 12/09/2019 20:30, Adam Ford wrote: > >>> The thermal sensor in the omap3 family isn't accurate, but it's > >>> better than nothing. The various OPP's enabled for the omap3630 > >>> support up to OPP1G, however the datasheet for the DM3730 states > >>> that OPP130 and OPP1G are not available above TJ of 90C. > >>> > >>> This patch configures the thermal throttling to limit the > >>> operating points of the omap3630 to Only OPP50 and OPP100 if > >>> the thermal sensor reads a value above 90C. > > Oh, that's a very interesting use case. > > AFAICT the thermal framework is not designed to deal with this > situation. I agree this setup may work (even if I'm not convinced about > the stability of the whole). > > May be Viresh can help for the cpufreq side? Sorry but I am not able to understand what's not supported by thermal framework here and what can I do to help :) -- viresh
