* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [190903 08:15]: > On 03/09/2019 11:10, Rob Herring wrote: > > I prefer that bindings be complete as possible even if driver support > > is not there yet. Adding power domain support may only mean adding > > '#power-domain-cells'. > > > > The location is fine then. > > Yeah, I assume just adding power-domain-cells should be enough. I am not too > sure before I start trying this out though so did not want to add it yet. Should we call the device tree node name power-controller instead of reset controller though? Most of the PRM instances do not have a separate rstctrl reset control functionality. Anybody got better any better naming in mind? Regards, Tony
