* Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [190819 19:26]: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:03 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > * Adam Ford <aford173@xxxxxxxxx> [190816 23:02]: > > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 8:16 AM Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Well I just posted some sgx interconnect target module patches. We might > > > > still have them in v5.4 assuming people manage to review and test them. > > > > > > Nikolaus, > > > > > > I tested Tony's change and I can confirm that I can read the value > > > when enabled. Should I apply his patches to your branch before I > > > test, or is it go too to go as-is? I've got an AM3517, OMAP35 and a > > > DM3730. I am not sure if the AM3517 is even on the radar, but it has > > > an sgx530 as well. > > > > My estimate is am3517 is wired the same way as omap34xx with a 60% > > chance, then 30% chance it's wired the same way as omap36xx, and then > > 10% chance for similar wiring to am335x.. So hopefully that leaves 0% > > chance for yet something different for it's wiring :) > > Based on [1], I went under the assumption it was wired like the > omap34xx. I applied your omap34 patches to the am3517.dtsi, and I was > able to get the same response as I did for the omap3530. Do you want > me to post the patches to the mailing list, or do you want to do it? OK great, yeah please post patches :) Thanks, TOny
