On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:34:42AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:25 AM William Breathitt Gray > <vilhelm.gray@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 08:48:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:45:35 -0500 > > > David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > This documents device tree binding for the Texas Instruments Enhanced > > > > Quadrature Encoder Pulse (eQEP) Module found in various TI SoCs. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Lechner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Up to William given it is a counter binding, (unless Rob overrules) > > > but new bindings are generally preferred as yaml. > > > > > > Content looks fine to me. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Jonathan > > > > Rob, > > > > Would you prefer these bindings as yaml, or shall I accept them as they > > are now? > > Still up to you at this point, but I certainly prefer them to be DT schema. > > Rob I think YAML would be a good idea, it's simple and expressive enough while still being human-readable, and if new bindings in other subsystems are switching to yaml then we may as well. David, resubmit this as yaml in version 2 and I'll pick it up. Thanks, William Breathitt Gray
