> > Pavel, I hope this more extended explanation makes sense to you, and > > that you simply have not seen me write these same details in the past. > > Blimey. That's a really long winded way of saying: > > "Modular-ness is actually broken in these drivers; [Paul]'s patches > make that point clear for all to see. If people (authors/distros) > wish them to be modular, they need to fix them properly." Has that been checked? I mean... when I saw the patch I thought "perhaps it should be doing bool->tristate instead"? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
