* Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx> [190110 13:24]: > > On 10-Jan-19 5:37 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 01:44:03PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > >> * Vignesh R <vigneshr@xxxxxx> [190109 09:11]: > >>> 8250_omap is DT only driver so dev->of_node always exists. Drop check > >>> for existence of valid dev->of_node to simplify omap8250_probe(). > >> > >> That part seems safe to me now. > >> > >>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c > >> ... > >>> - const struct of_device_id *id; > >>> - > >>> - ret = of_alias_get_id(pdev->dev.of_node, "serial"); > >>> - > >>> - of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-frequency", > >>> - &up.port.uartclk); > >>> - priv->wakeirq = irq_of_parse_and_map(pdev->dev.of_node, 1); > >>> - > >>> - id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(omap8250_dt_ids), &pdev->dev); > >>> - if (id && id->data) > >>> - priv->habit |= *(u8 *)id->data; > >> > >> But this part it seems we still need to keep around > >> as we still have lots of clock-frequency references > >> in the *.dtsi files. Or am I missing something? > > > > It's re-added a couple of lines later. Only the indent was removed. > > > > That's right. You beat me to it. Thanks :) Oh right, sorry I missed that :) Regards, Tony
