On 30/11/2018 09:57, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Tero Kristo (2018-11-29 23:35:35)
On 30/11/2018 09:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Andreas Kemnade (2018-11-29 22:15:34)
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 16:25:05 -0800
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Quoting Andreas Kemnade (2018-11-10 12:31:14)
Code might use autoidle api with clocks not being omap2 clocks,
so check if clock type is not basic
Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
New in v2
---
drivers/clk/ti/autoidle.c | 12 ++++++++++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/ti/autoidle.c b/drivers/clk/ti/autoidle.c
index 161f67850393..5bdae5552d38 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/ti/autoidle.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/ti/autoidle.c
@@ -54,8 +54,12 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(autoidle_spinlock);
int omap2_clk_deny_idle(struct clk *clk)
{
struct clk_hw_omap *c;
+ struct clk_hw *hw = __clk_get_hw(clk);
- c = to_clk_hw_omap(__clk_get_hw(clk));
+ if (clk_hw_get_flags(hw) & CLK_IS_BASIC)
Please try to avoid using CLK_IS_BASIC if at all possible. Can you?
Maybe add some flag in clk_hw_omap() instead?
hmm, Tero suggested that.
But to check flags in clk_hw_omap I first need to know that there is a
clk_hw_omap behind clk_hw. And for that I either need to check flags in
clk_hw or do more changes in the omap_hwmod code.
Can you do it? The omap code is the only user of CLK_IS_BASIC. All the
other users are marking clks with this but there is no reason to do so.
I'll go make another pass over the tree and nuke those ones from orbit.
The reason for using this flag is because OMAP uses two clock types
around, the basic clocks like fixed-factor-clock/fixed-clock, and then
all the omap derivatives, which can be cast to clk_hw_omap. If we want
to avoid usage of CLK_IS_BASIC, we need to copy paste the remaining
basic code under drivers/clk/ti/ and convert them to use clk_hw_omap as
internal datatype. Is this preferred?
No that is not preferred. Can the omap2_clk_deny_idle() function be
integrated closer into the clk framework in some way that allows it to
be part of the clk_ops structure? And then have that take a clk_hw
structure instead of a struct clk? I haven't looked at this in any
detail whatsoever so I may be way off right now.
It could be added under the main clk_ops struct, however this would
introduce two new func pointers to it which are not used by anything
else but OMAP. Are you aware of any other platforms requiring similar
feature?
-Tero
--
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
