Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Cleanup and split core/sidetone support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jarkko,

On 2018-11-07 20:57, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
> On 11/7/18 3:23 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Two patch added to address the code move triggered few warnings from build.
>>   One of them is around mcbsp->pdata checks (not valid complaint), the other is
>>   that we set -EINVAL to unsigned variables (they were not used in that case)
>>
>> While preparing for merging the davinci and omap directories (I will send the
>> series for that shortly) I have taken some time to do cleanup on the McBSP
>> driver.
>>
>> The mcbsp.c/h files were the result when we moved code from arch/arm/plat-omap
>> to sound/soc/omap/ a long time ago and it contained code for McBSP core and the
>> OMAP3 sidetone functionality.
>>
>> With this series I tried to split the core and sidetone code to separate files.
>>
>> There were two reasons for this:
>> 1. to have the OMAP specific DAI driver files prefixed with omap-* under the new
>>    sound/soc/ti/ directory
>> 2. easier to find functions as all sidetone code is in separate file.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>> ---
>> Peter Ujfalusi (7):
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Clean up dma_data addr initialization code
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Clean up the interrupt handlers
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Simplify the mcbsp_start/_stop function parameters
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Move out the FIFO check from set_threshold and
>>     get_delay
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Re-arrange files for core McBSP and Sidetone
>>     function split
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: Remove redundant check for mcbsp->pdata
>>   ASoC: omap-mcbsp: No need to initialize max_xx_thres when it is not
>>     used
>>
> Minor comments, no need to resend. Patch 1/7 looked like it could be
> splitted into two but don't know is it worth of effort, maybe not.

I can split it to two by separating out the removal of maxburst
initialization, not a big effort. I just wanted to cut down the number
of patches.

FWIW I have tested it on Nokia n810, Beagle-xM (Sidetone enabled) and
Pandaboard-ES. I still need to get my Nokia n900 for the test.

> Then I was thinking can 6-7/7 be moved before 5/7?

I thought about that, but decided to do the code move with minimal
change. 6-7/7 is not strictly needed change in the context of 5/7.

> I'll try to give a test to the set perhaps during weekend but don't let
> that delay the process.
> 
> Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,

I'll send v3 with the split patch 1/7 and adding you ack, Mark can
decide if he wants to wait for your testing as well (I would).

- Péter

Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux