* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [181004 14:47]: > On 04/10/18 17:25, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > It seems we should just provide a generic interface for > > clk_allow_autoidle() and clk_deny_autoidle()? Otherwise we'll > > be forever stuck with pdata callbacks it seems. > > The TI clock driver is actually providing these APIs, so that should be > fine. I don't think there is any use / need for pdata callbacks atm, it just > happens hwmod core is calling these at the moment which might have confused > you. Hmm OK. So do we already have some way to deny autoidle for a clock from ti-sysc.c driver without pdata callbacks? Suman pointed out few days ago that for a reset driver to work we must do clkdm_deny_idle() and clkdm_allow_idle() as the hwmod code does. I gues that really just boils down to doing clk deny idle and allow idle on the clockdomain clkctrl clock? Regards, Tony
