On Wed 2018-10-03 07:24:23, Dan Murphy wrote: > Hello > > On 10/02/2018 02:28 AM, Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Fri 2018-09-28 13:29:47, Dan Murphy wrote: > >> Remove support for the LM3697 LED device > >> from the ti-lmu. The LM3697 will be supported > >> via a stand alone LED driver. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx> > > > > NAK, for reasons I explained before. Please add it to the patch so > > that it does not get applied by mistake. Ouch and AFAICT Rob was not > > happy with this either. > > > > Yes, you are creating new drivers, ok; but that does _not_ mean you > > should create new binding. > > I am copying my comment here on the review of this original binding for > records > > I found the review or at least the reference for the ti-lmu.txt binding. > > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/764180/ > > Does not appear that the binding was sent to the device tree mail list. > (Maybe that email list did not exist in Feb 2017). Quick google shows: https://lwn.net/Articles/666023/ Now can we stop this nonsense? If there is a problem with the binding, submit patches to fix the problem. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
