* Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [180927 06:35]: > On 26/09/18 22:13, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi, > > > > * Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> [180904 15:41]: > > > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@xxxxxx> [180831 15:11]: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > This series splits up the clkctrl data for TI SoCs based on clockdomain > > > > boundaries, instead of the current CM boundaries. For rest of the SoCs, > > > > the CM boundaries are actually the same as clockdomains, only am3/am4/dra7 > > > > are mutants. > > > > > > > > This is done in preparation for better supporting Tony's upcoming > > > > interconnect driver data introduction for these SoCs. > > > > > > > > One thing to note is that we maintain backwards compatibility with this > > > > series, the compat data is introduced temporarily for this purpose. The > > > > compat data can be ditched after couple of release cycles when nobody > > > > needs it anymore. > > > > > > > > The series can be applied independently, as the compat data support > > > > makes care that the switch is only done once DT changes are in place. > > > > > > When this is ready for merging, can you guys please set up an > > > immutable branch against v4.19-rc1 with the drivers/clk changes > > > for me to merge in too? > > > > > > I've tested this on am335x and am437x so far and it works fine > > > for me, so for the whole series: > > > > > > Tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Any news on getting this into Linux next and merged? The > > immutable is still needed too for the dts changes. > > > > This is currently blocked from my side, as the patch [1] from Johan got in > clk-next is conflicting with my series. Asked Stephen for either dropping > that patch and letting me pick it up but no response so far. > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/8/22/160 Hmm well the idea is to not redo branches. So how about send Stephen a pull request against Johan's patch commit 00a461cc32ec ("clk: ti: fix OF child-node lookup")? That is assuming 00a461cc32ec is considered immutable and OK to use as a base by Stephen? :) And assuming that your pull request gets merged, and we all consider that branch immutable too, then I can merge it in too for the dts changes. It will bring also Rob's clean-up patch 00a461cc32ec ("clk: ti: fix OF child-node lookup") too but that's just fine. Regards, Tony
