Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] i2c: allow drivers to announce that they are IRQ safe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> There is still the "if (in_atomic() || irqs_disabled())" thing in
> i2c_transfer(), something we did not replicate in the recent
> rework of i2c_smbus_xfer()
> 
> Do we not need to do that dance in i2c_smbus_xfer() too and as apart
> of that add ->smbus_xfer_irqless?

I'd be pragmtic here and only add it when it is needed. Nobody wanted it
so far. It would throw lockdep warnings and irq related OOPSes if
somebody uses SMBus for this. So, I'd expect we would know of a user.

> My guess was that many things that needs to be done "late" are
> performed as one of the i2c_smbus_read/write... calls, but what do I
> know? Or maybe I'm just too far ahead?

They are probably SMBus calls but my bet is that they will get emulated
to I2C transfers. SMBus controllers are more common on PC hardware and
above I'd say, and those seem to have so far their custom firmware
methods to shut down.

With all that being said, if there is someone who needs it, we can add
it later.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux