Hi, > Am 29.07.2018 um 20:08 schrieb Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 08:32:41AM +0200, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: >> Hi, >> >>> Am 28.07.2018 um 22:35 schrieb Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>> Hi Andreas, >>> >>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 06:59:14PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: >>>> I got this in the kernel log: >>>> [ 0.756042] omap-dmtimer-pwm dmtimer-pwm: dmtimer pdata structure NULL >>>> [ 0.756134] omap-dmtimer-pwm: probe of dmtimer-pwm failed with error -22 >>>> >>>> the probe function has to wait until omap_dm_timer_probe() in >>>> clocksource/timer-ti-dm.c has initialized pdata, so defer probing >>> >>> There already is a patch by David Rivshin addressing the same issue... >> >> Here it is: >> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/943148/ >> >> but hasn't arrived in linux-next. > > That's because there'll be v3. > >> But it is questionable if a driver should dev_info() about doing deferred probing. >> IMHO, it should just do it which is how Andreas' patch works. > > See here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/949659/ Ah, I see (neither Andreas nor me did follow the original discussions and therefore came up independently with the same thoughts). So we will wait for the v3. BR and thanks, Nikolaus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
