On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> This removes the of_compatible for the backlight sub-device. There
> will be no extra sub-node for the backlight.
Won't doing this in a separate patch break bisectability?
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
> index 2ee09d099832..de76298cf3a8 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/ti-lmu.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3532_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3532,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3532-backlight",
> },
> };
>
> @@ -78,7 +77,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3631_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3631,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3631-backlight",
> },
> };
>
> @@ -89,7 +87,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3632_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3632,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3632-backlight",
> },
> };
>
> @@ -97,7 +94,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3633_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3633,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3633-backlight",
> },
> {
> .name = "lm3633-leds",
> @@ -115,7 +111,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3695_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3695,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3695-backlight",
> },
> };
>
> @@ -123,7 +118,6 @@ static const struct mfd_cell lm3697_devices[] = {
> {
> .name = "ti-lmu-backlight",
> .id = LM3697,
> - .of_compatible = "ti,lm3697-backlight",
> },
> /* Monitoring driver for open/short circuit detection */
> {
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
