Hi,
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 09:53:15AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Mar 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 04:32:11PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > > +static const struct mfd_cell cpcap_mfd_devices[] = {
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > + }, {
> > > > + .name = "cpcap-led",
> > > > + .id = 4,
> > > > + .of_compatible = "motorola,cpcap-led-cp",
> > > > + }, {
> > > > + .name = "cpcap-codec",
> > > > + }
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > With none of the entries containing platform_data /me wonders why you
> > > can't still use devm_of_platform_populate()?
> >
> > Because devm_of_platform_populate works with compatible properties and
> > cpcap-codec does not have one after I removed it for Mark.
>
> Sorry, I missed that conversation. Why was it removed?
I had it in PATCHv1-PATCHv4. It was removed, since Mark didn't want
to have it in the DT ABI.
-- Sebastian
> > > > static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > > > {
> > > > const struct of_device_id *match;
> > > > @@ -260,7 +308,8 @@ static int cpcap_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> > > > if (ret)
> > > > return ret;
> > > >
> > > > - return devm_of_platform_populate(&cpcap->spi->dev);
> > > > + return devm_mfd_add_devices(&spi->dev, 0, cpcap_mfd_devices,
> > > > + ARRAY_SIZE(cpcap_mfd_devices), NULL, 0, NULL);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static struct spi_driver cpcap_driver = {
> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Lee Jones [李琼斯]
> Linaro Services Technical Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
