On Wednesday 24 January 2018 10:56 AM, Keerthy wrote:
>
>
> On Monday 22 January 2018 04:23 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>> Dear Claudiu,
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 11:17:08AM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>>> On 17.01.2018 23:47, Ladislav Michl wrote:
>>>> @@ -334,18 +348,18 @@ static int pwm_omap_dmtimer_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>
>>>> mutex_init(&omap->mutex);
>>>>
>>>> - status = pwmchip_add(&omap->chip);
>>>> - if (status < 0) {
>>>> + ret = pwmchip_add(&omap->chip);
>>>> + if (ret < 0) {
>>>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to register PWM\n");
>>>> - omap->pdata->free(omap->dm_timer);
>>>> - ret = status;
>>>> - goto put;
>>>> + goto free;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, omap);
>>> >From documentation: "of_parse_phandle(): Returns the device_node pointer with refcount
>>> incremented. Use of_node_put() on it when done."
>>> In case of success the of_node_put() should also be called as I see.
>>
>> Based on you previous suggestions found here:
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10140209/
>> I'd say this fix belongs to patch which introduces of_node_put() in the error
>> path. I'll then rebase this patches on top of the fix.
>
> Agreed. I missed the success path as i assumed only error paths needed
> te of_node_put(). I will post v8 of this patch alone as other patches
> can be left untouched. Hope that is okay.
Ladis,
I posted v8 of the above mentioned patch alone.
https://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=151677273619960&w=2
Thanks,
Keerthy
>
> Regards,
> Keerthy
>>
>> Thank you,
>> ladis
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
