On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 08:55:42AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Derald D. Woods <woods.technical@xxxxxxxxx> [171212 16:34]: > > I am testing using an appended device-tree. This has been the most > > reliable method for the OMAP34XX boards that I have. If you have an > > example config, with working command line MTDPARTS, for beagleboard(Rev. > > C4), Overo TOBI, or similiar OMAP34XX, I will gladly use it. Also note > > that other OMAP34XX boards currently provide a default partition > > layout. Is that bad practice for all of those as well? I am open to > > exploring the method that actually works. > > I think we came to the conclusion at some point that it's best to rely > on u-boot passed partitions because with later u-boot versions the > size was increased for the bootloader partition. > > Ideally of course we would read the partition information from the > MTD device somewhere.. Already done and called UBI :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
