* H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [171128 15:04]:
> Hi Tony,
>
> > Am 28.11.2017 um 15:57 schrieb Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >
> > * H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [171116 08:53]:
> >> Vendor string is "tpo" and not "toppoly".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> >> index 4504908c23fe..ec27ed67a22a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-gta04.dtsi
> >> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
> >>
> >> /* lcd panel */
> >> lcd: td028ttec1@0 {
> >> - compatible = "toppoly,td028ttec1";
> >> + compatible = "tpo,td028ttec1";
> >> reg = <0>;
> >> spi-max-frequency = <100000>;
> >> spi-cpol;
> >
> > Applying into omap-for-v4.15/fixes thanks. The other dts patch seems
> > like it can wait for v4.16 merge window.
>
> Hm. Not really. It needs the panel driver to match. So either both or
> none should be applied or it will break the panel from working.
>
> I am just 1-2 hours away from submitting a -v3 (rebased and tested
> on top of 4.15-rc1).
OK fine dropping both. Please update the description in both dts
patches to make it clear they are needed as a fix. Preferrably
with a proper fixes tag.
Having "We can remove the "omapdss," prefix" in the description sure
does not sounds like it's needed as a fix :)
Sounds like maybe these two should be just a single patch for
a proper fix?
Regards,
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
