Re: USB regression in next-20171108 with hub spamming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:05:11PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> Hi Felipe & Greg,
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like in next-20171108 USB hub is spamming console about once a
>>>> second after commit 7dfd74fd128 ("Merge remote-tracking branch
>>>> 'usb/usb-next'").
>>>> 
>>>> Any ideas? See the log below.
>>>
>>> Any chance you can run 'git bisect'?
>>
>> I wonder if it was caused by the usb_get_std_status() changes. We didn't
>> catch this in our testing, though. I left the patches in intel's
>> validation for a few days before sending out.
>>
>> Let me compile that very tag and try it with one of our machines.
>>
>> Tony, a bisection would be useful, indeed.
>
> reproduced. Digging to figure out what's going on.

Okay, found it. Testing a patch.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux