On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:34:30AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: > Hi, > > > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > > On 16/10/17 02:21, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > OneNAND sets up timings on its own. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Note: see cover letter. > > > > drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 167 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > include/linux/omap-gpmc.h | 7 ++ > > 2 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > We could squash this into patch 7. Yes, but only after someone (myself after some coffee?) comes with an idea how to return sync read/write flags into MTD driver properly. > > diff --git a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c > > index fc7c3c2a0b04..b2fe3be4f914 100644 > > --- a/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c > > @@ -1143,6 +1143,169 @@ struct gpmc_nand_ops *gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops(struct gpmc_nand_regs *reg, int cs) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops); > > > > +static void gpmc_omap_onenand_calc_async_timings(struct gpmc_timings *t, > > + struct gpmc_settings *s) > > +{ > > + struct gpmc_device_timings dev_t; > > + const int t_cer = 15; > > + const int t_avdp = 12; > > + const int t_aavdh = 7; > > + const int t_ce = 76; > > + const int t_aa = 76; > > + const int t_oe = 20; > > + const int t_cez = 20; /* max of t_cez, t_oez */ > > + const int t_wpl = 40; > > + const int t_wph = 30; > > + > > + /* > > + * Note that we need to keep sync_write set for the call to > > + * omap2_onenand_set_async_mode() to work to detect the onenand > > + * supported clock rate for the sync timings. > > + */ > > + s->sync_read = false; > > + s->sync_write = true; > > + > > + memset(&dev_t, 0, sizeof(dev_t)); > > + > > + dev_t.t_avdp_r = max_t(int, t_avdp, t_cer) * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_avdp_w = dev_t.t_avdp_r; > > + dev_t.t_aavdh = t_aavdh * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_aa = t_aa * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_ce = t_ce * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_oe = t_oe * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_cez_r = t_cez * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_cez_w = dev_t.t_cez_r; > > + dev_t.t_wpl = t_wpl * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_wph = t_wph * 1000; > > + > > + gpmc_calc_timings(t, s, &dev_t); > > +} > > Let's get rid of manually setting async timings. The async timings should come from the > device tree like it is done now for NAND or any other generic GPMC child. I'd go for smaller incremental steps :) > We can populate the same values into all the NAND DT nodes present as of now. And those values are? > > +static int gpmc_omap_onenand_calc_sync_timings(struct gpmc_timings *t, > > + struct gpmc_settings *s, > > + int freq) > > +{ > > + struct gpmc_device_timings dev_t; > > + const int t_cer = 15; > > + const int t_avdp = 12; > > + const int t_cez = 20; /* max of t_cez, t_oez */ > > + const int t_wpl = 40; > > + const int t_wph = 30; > > + int min_gpmc_clk_period, t_ces, t_avds, t_avdh, t_ach, t_aavdh, t_rdyo; > > + int div, gpmc_clk_ns, latency; > > + > > + if (!s->sync_read && !s->sync_write) > > + return 0; > > + > > + switch (freq) { > > + case 104: > > + min_gpmc_clk_period = 9600; /* 104 MHz */ > > + t_ces = 3; > > + t_avds = 4; > > + t_avdh = 2; > > + t_ach = 3; > > + t_aavdh = 6; > > + t_rdyo = 6; > > + break; > > + case 83: > > + min_gpmc_clk_period = 12000; /* 83 MHz */ > > + t_ces = 5; > > + t_avds = 4; > > + t_avdh = 2; > > + t_ach = 6; > > + t_aavdh = 6; > > + t_rdyo = 9; > > + break; > > + case 66: > > + min_gpmc_clk_period = 15000; /* 66 MHz */ > > + t_ces = 6; > > + t_avds = 5; > > + t_avdh = 2; > > + t_ach = 6; > > + t_aavdh = 6; > > + t_rdyo = 11; > > + break; > > + default: > > + min_gpmc_clk_period = 18500; /* 54 MHz */ > > + t_ces = 7; > > + t_avds = 7; > > + t_avdh = 7; > > + t_ach = 9; > > + t_aavdh = 7; > > + t_rdyo = 15; > > + s->sync_write = false; > > + s->burst_write = false; > > + break; > > + } > > + > > + div = gpmc_calc_divider(min_gpmc_clk_period); > > + gpmc_clk_ns = gpmc_ticks_to_ns(div); > > + if (gpmc_clk_ns < 12) /* >83 MHz */ > > + latency = 8; > > + else if (gpmc_clk_ns < 15) /* >66 MHz */ > > + latency = 6; > > + else if (gpmc_clk_ns >= 25) /* 40 MHz */ > > + latency = 3; > > + else > > + latency = 4; > > + > > + /* Set synchronous read timings */ > > + memset(&dev_t, 0, sizeof(dev_t)); > > + > > + if (!s->sync_write) { > > + dev_t.t_avdp_w = max(t_avdp, t_cer) * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_wpl = t_wpl * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_wph = t_wph * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_aavdh = t_aavdh * 1000; > > + } > > + dev_t.ce_xdelay = true; > > + dev_t.avd_xdelay = true; > > + dev_t.oe_xdelay = true; > > + dev_t.we_xdelay = true; > > + dev_t.clk = min_gpmc_clk_period; > > + dev_t.t_bacc = dev_t.clk; > > + dev_t.t_ces = t_ces * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_avds = t_avds * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_avdh = t_avdh * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_ach = t_ach * 1000; > > + dev_t.cyc_iaa = (latency + 1); > > + dev_t.t_cez_r = t_cez * 1000; > > + dev_t.t_cez_w = dev_t.t_cez_r; > > + dev_t.cyc_aavdh_oe = 1; > > + dev_t.t_rdyo = t_rdyo * 1000 + min_gpmc_clk_period; > > + > > + gpmc_calc_timings(t, s, &dev_t); > > + > > + return latency; > > +} > > + > > +int gpmc_omap_onenand_set_sync_timings(struct device *dev, int cs, int freq) > > +{ > > + int latency, ret; > > + struct gpmc_timings gpmc_t; > > + struct gpmc_settings gpmc_s; > > + > > + gpmc_read_settings_dt(dev->of_node, &gpmc_s); > > + > > + latency = gpmc_omap_onenand_calc_sync_timings(&gpmc_t, &gpmc_s, freq); > > + if (latency > 0) { > > + ret = gpmc_cs_program_settings(cs, &gpmc_s); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + > > + ret = gpmc_cs_set_timings(cs, &gpmc_t, &gpmc_s); > > + if (ret < 0) > > + return ret; > > + } > > + > > +// if (gpmc_s.sync_read) > > +// if (gpmc_s.sync_write) > > ?? See first paragraph answer and cover letter. > > + > > + return latency; > > +} > > + > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpmc_omap_onenand_set_sync_timings); > > + > > int gpmc_get_client_irq(unsigned irq_config) > > { > > if (!gpmc_irq_domain) { > > @@ -2097,9 +2260,7 @@ static int gpmc_probe_child(struct platform_device *pdev, > > if (ret) > > goto err; > > > > - /* OneNAND driver handles timings on its own */ > > - gpmc_cs_enable_mem(cs); > > - goto no_timings; > > + gpmc_omap_onenand_calc_async_timings(&gpmc_t, &gpmc_s); > > this should be undone. Yes, after we fix timings in DT. Seems you are considering it safe and easy, okay to sent separate patches this late in release cycle? ;-) We could start merging with clean table then. > > } else { > > ret = of_property_read_u32(child, "bank-width", > > &gpmc_s.device_width); > > diff --git a/include/linux/omap-gpmc.h b/include/linux/omap-gpmc.h > > index fd0de00c0d77..22a2e6b43669 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/omap-gpmc.h > > +++ b/include/linux/omap-gpmc.h > > @@ -28,12 +28,19 @@ struct gpmc_nand_regs; > > #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OMAP_GPMC) > > struct gpmc_nand_ops *gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops(struct gpmc_nand_regs *regs, > > int cs); > > +int gpmc_omap_onenand_set_sync_timings(struct device *dev, int cs, int freq); > > #else > > static inline struct gpmc_nand_ops *gpmc_omap_get_nand_ops(struct gpmc_nand_regs *regs, > > int cs) > > { > > return NULL; > > } > > + > > +static inline int gpmc_omap_onenand_set_sync_timings(struct device *dev, > > + int cs, int freq) > > +{ > > + return 0; > > +} > > #endif /* CONFIG_OMAP_GPMC */ > > > > /*--------------------------------*/ > > > > -- > cheers, > -roger -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html