On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:03:59AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > Vinod, > > > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > > On 2017-09-21 20:30, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 02:35:32PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > >> When looking for unused xbar_out lane we should also protect the set_bit() > >> call with the same mutex to protect against concurrent threads picking the > >> same ID. > > > > Applied, thanks > > > > Just a note, somehow the patches from you only are getting mangled for me. > > Curiously, the ones in patchworks are fine and I used to apply that, not sure > > what mail servers at our work places are doing!! > > I'm afraid it is our mail servers where the mangling is happening :( > We are trying to resolve this since early August when it first started > to happen (and only for the guys in Finland). > We are as frustrated as one can be, believe me. > > PS: And the mangler will add a footer on top of this mail ah okay, consider sending using some other server then, or just put up a linux box in the corner like we do (@linux.intel.com) -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
