On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:50:03AM +0530, Arvind Yadav wrote: > devm_kasprintf() can fail here and we must check its return value. This is patch 2/3 but you've only sent me this one patch. This is missing the point of numbering a series, the only reason for the numbering is to provide ordering within the series. If you send a patch separately or as part of a different series then the numbering should change to reflect how things are being sent.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
