On 19-09-17, 15:06, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> Rather than letting the ti-cpufreq driver match against 'ti,am4372'
> machine compatible during probe let's match against 'ti,am43' so that we
> can support both 'ti,am4372' and 'ti,am438x' platforms which both match
> to this compatible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> index b29cd3398463..4bf47de6101f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c
> @@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ static int ti_cpufreq_setup_syscon_register(struct ti_cpufreq_data *opp_data)
>
> static const struct of_device_id ti_cpufreq_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "ti,am33xx", .data = &am3x_soc_data, },
> - { .compatible = "ti,am4372", .data = &am4x_soc_data, },
> + { .compatible = "ti,am43", .data = &am4x_soc_data, },
> { .compatible = "ti,dra7", .data = &dra7_soc_data },
> {},
> };
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
