Re: [PATCH] gpio: omap: Fix lost edge interrupts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/15/2017 04:45 PM, Ladislav Michl wrote:
> From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
> 
> Edge interrupts are already cleared in omap_gpio_irq_handler,
> so clearing them again in omap_gpio_ack_irq causes lost
> interrupts.
> 
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <ladis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> index dbf869fb63ce..a25738862129 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
> @@ -811,7 +811,12 @@ static void omap_gpio_ack_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>   	struct gpio_bank *bank = omap_irq_data_get_bank(d);
>   	unsigned offset = d->hwirq;
>   
> -	omap_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, offset);
> +	/*
> +	 * Edge GPIOs are already cleared during handling, clearing
> +	 * them here again will cause lost interrupts.
> +	 */
> +	if (bank->level_mask & BIT(offset))
> +		omap_clear_gpio_irqstatus(bank, offset);
>   }
>   
>   static void omap_gpio_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> 

Huh. You are back :) Thanks a lot for testing this and for your time.

Actually, I'd like you to add one more change in this patch as it make no sense
to enable/disable edge IRQs while clearing status.

                /* clear edge sensitive interrupts before handler(s) are
                called so that we don't miss any interrupt occurred while
                executing them */
-               omap_disable_gpio_irqbank(bank, isr_saved & ~level_mask);
-               omap_clear_gpio_irqbank(bank, isr_saved & ~level_mask);
-               omap_enable_gpio_irqbank(bank, isr_saved & ~level_mask);
+               if (isr_saved & ~level_mask)
+                       omap_clear_gpio_irqbank(bank, isr_saved & ~level_mask);

Also, It seems your idea to use handle_simple_irq() for edge IRQ should also work. like

@@ -518,7 +518,12 @@ static int omap_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned type)
        if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH))
                irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_level_irq);
        else if (type & (IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING | IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING))
-               irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_edge_irq);
+               /*
+                * Edge GPIOs are already cleared during handling and not
+                * masked, clearing them here again will cause lost interrupts.
+                * So just use handle_simple_irq.
+                */
+               irq_set_handler_locked(d, handle_simple_irq);


So, I think it will look better If you can check above and it'll works the same.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux