On 06/13/2017 03:18 AM, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
Hi Grygorii,
2017-06-13 0:41 GMT+02:00 Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx>:
On 06/12/2017 04:24 PM, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
I don't think it makes sense to have the interrupt resources for charger
and power button in two different places, the driver and the DT binding.
That's confusing so remove the ones from the mfd driver in favour of
having the interrupt resources only described in the DT. Having the
resources in DT may help if there is or will be a similar pmic with
different resource allocation.
Wouldn't this break DT compatibility? Old DTs do not contain IRQ resources
and so they work only because of IRQ definitions in code.
I don't think so, the DT binding [1] and [2] says that the interrupts
proprieties are required, so the bindings that that doesn't have these
proprieties are wrong. Also I suspect that the binding that doesn't
define the interrupts expect the hw block disabled as the status =
"disabled" was defined, so I don't think was his intention have i.e
the charger active.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/supply/tps65217_charger.txt
[2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/tps65218-pwrbutton.txt
Ok. fair enough.
Anyway, personally I would prefer to remove irqs from DT, but as both
points are valid - its up to maintainers to decide.
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
