* Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170606 07:37]: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Yegor Yefremov > <yegorslists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Uwe, Tony, > > > > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 7:19 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> * Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [170526 11:09]: > >>> According to the binding documentation and the source code the omap-gpio > >>> controller takes IRQ_TYPE_* as its flags values, not GPIO_ACTIVE_*. > >>> > >>> This patch uses the right variable type which yields the same result > >>> when compiled. Note that this might be wrong and actually > >>> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW is intended by the dt author. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <uwe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> --- > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> can somebody with the hardware or it's documentation please check which > >>> flag is the right one? > >> > >> I'll wait on this one until we have somebody test it. > > > > I'll look at it this week. > > This is what works for me (at least it doesn't produce "irq 88: nobody > cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)"). > > As for tca6416 it is working with all possible settings (from > IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING till IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW). "cat /proc/interrupts" > always shows Level type: > > 47: 5 44e07000.gpio 20 Level 1-0020 OK, can you please send a proper patch with description and Signed-off-by? That is unless Uwe cares to update his patch. Otherwise add Reported-by for Uwe :) Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
