On Tuesday 06 June 2017 04:14 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> [170606 00:52]: >> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 01:00 PM, Keerthy wrote: >>> On Tuesday 06 June 2017 12:47 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>>>>> Are all of these drivers DT only? >>>>> >>>>> At least i did not find any platform code calling on to these drivers. >>>>> No dependency on OF as such. Hence sent these 9. >>>> >>>> I can't accept these changes on any drivers which does not depend on >>>> OF as a hard requirement. >>> >>> Okay. So that is a per-requisite. At least palmas, tps65218, lp873x, >>> tps65217 imho can have the OF dependency. I will post patches for that >>> and then will resurrect this series. >>> >>> Thanks for your feedback. >> >> Tony, >> >> I do not see any platform specific code for tps65218, tps65217 and >> palmas. I believe they are all completely Device Tree based. Can i make >> them depend on OF? It helps me clear up some unused data from their mfd >> drivers. > > Yes all of arch/arm/mach-omap2 is device tree only nowadays. > There may be other SoCs or architectures using these too, > but grepping for platform_data should reveal that. Yes Tony. I did that for all the above mentioned devices. I did not find any references apart from device tree folder under arch/ folder. Apart from device tree folder and drivers/ folder i do not see any instances of palmas, tps65218, tps65917, lp873x. Shall i go ahead and introduce dependency on OF? > > Regards, > > Tony > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
