On 11-05-17, 13:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> gcc-7 warns about some declarations that are more 'const' than necessary:
>
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c:338:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
> static const struct of_device_id const ramc_ids[] __initconst = {
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/bcm_kona_smc.c:36:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
> static const struct of_device_id const bcm_kona_smc_ids[] __initconst = {
> arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c:207:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
> static const struct of_device_id const timer_of_match[] __initconst = {
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c:714:34: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
> static const struct of_device_id const omap_prcm_dt_match_table[] __initconst = {
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/vc.c:562:35: error: duplicate 'const' declaration specifier [-Werror=duplicate-decl-specifier]
> static const struct i2c_init_data const omap4_i2c_timing_data[] __initconst = {
>
> The ones in arch/arm were apparently all introduced accidentally by one
> commit that correctly marked a lot of variables as __initconst.
>
> Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 19c233b79d1a ("ARM: appropriate __init annotation for const data")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-spear/time.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
