Hi Roger,
On 04/20/2017 07:11 AM, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Some boards [1] leave the PHYs at an invalid state
> during system power-up or reset thus causing unreliability
> issues with the PHY which manifests as PHY not being detected
> or link not functional. To fix this, these PHYs need to be RESET
> via a GPIO connected to the PHY's RESET pin.
>
> Some boards have a single GPIO controlling the PHY RESET pin of all
> PHYs on the bus whereas some others have separate GPIOs controlling
> individual PHY RESETs.
>
> In both cases, the RESET de-assertion cannot be done in the PHY driver
> as the PHY will not probe till its reset is de-asserted.
> So do the RESET de-assertion in the MDIO bus driver.
>
> [1] - am572x-idk, am571x-idk, a437x-idk
>
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx>
A few comments on the binding and the code, sorry for this late review.
> +Example :
> +This example shows these optional properties, plus other properties
> +required for the TI Davinci MDIO driver.
> +
> + davinci_mdio: ethernet@0x5c030000 {
> + compatible = "ti,davinci_mdio";
> + reg = <0x5c030000 0x1000>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + reset-gpios = <&gpio2 5 GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>;
> + reset-delay-us = <2>; /* PHY datasheet states 1uS min */
us is micro seconds, uS is micro siemens.
> +
> + ethphy0: ethernet-phy@1 {
> + reg = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + ethphy1: ethernet-phy@3 {
> + reg = <3>;
> + };
> + };
>
> + /* de-assert bus level PHY GPIO resets */
> + for (i = 0; i < bus->num_reset_gpios; i++) {
> + gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(&bus->dev, "reset", i,
> + GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(gpiod);
> + if (err != -ENOENT) {
> + pr_err("mii_bus %s couldn't get reset GPIO\n",
> + bus->id);
Could we use dev_err(&bus->dev) here to better identify which MDIO bus
is returning the problem?
> + return err;
Should we somehow "unwind" the reset lines we were able to successfully
take out of reset and therefore put back into reset state? How about
mdiobus_unregister()? Should we have similar code there, if not for
correctness to be more power efficient?
> + }
> + } else {
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 1);
> + udelay(bus->reset_delay_us);
> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(gpiod, 0);
Does that work even if the polarity of the reset line is active low?
Thanks!
--
Florian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
