Re: [PATCH 1/4] regmap: irq: Fix lost interrupts by introducing handle_reread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> [170328 09:51]:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 08:47:41AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> [170328 08:21]:
> 
> > > Right, my thinking here is that by pushing into genirq we minimise the
> > > need even further since it'll also be available to drivers not using
> > > regmap-irq.
> 
> > > > like, handle until we get IRQ_NONE? :)
> 
> > > Well, that's what the per driver emulation does so...  yeah.  Probably
> > > with an upper limit on the number of times we do that.
> 
> > OK let's first see how that would work. I'll send a patch
> > for that.
> 
> Thanks.  Can you keep me on the CC please?  It's something I keep
> thinking about looking at myself.

Sure will do, you'll get some shared flames on it :)

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux