On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:33:30AM -0500, Andrew F. Davis wrote: > I still don't like this style of workaround, if kexec cannot regain > control of core1 without a hard core reset than kexec should BUG() and > force the user to reboot to a sane state. No, because kexec might already be in progress, and that would create an infinite loop of kexec -> bug -> kexec -> bug etc. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
