"Syed Rafiuddin" <rafiuddin.syed@xxxxxx> writes:
> This patch enables support for UART4 on OMAP4430 development platform.
>
> Signed-off-by: Syed Rafiuddin <rafiuddin.syed@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c 2009-05-12
> 10:43:41.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c 2009-05-12 11:40:54.000000000
> +0530
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
> };
>
> static struct omap_uart_config sdp4430_uart_config __initdata = {
> - .enabled_uarts = ((1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2)),
> + .enabled_uarts = ((1 << 0) | (1 << 1) | (1 << 2) | (1 << 3)),
> };
>
> static struct omap_lcd_config sdp4430_lcd_config __initdata = {
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c 2009-05-12 11:35:55.000000000
> +0530
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c 2009-05-12 11:46:13.000000000 +0530
> @@ -53,8 +53,20 @@
> .iotype = UPIO_MEM,
> .regshift = 2,
> .uartclk = OMAP24XX_BASE_BAUD * 16,
> +
> + }, {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP4
> + .membase = IO_ADDRESS(OMAP_UART3_BASE),
> + .mapbase = OMAP_UART4_BASE,
> + .irq = 70,
> + .flags = UPF_BOOT_AUTOCONF,
> + .iotype = UPIO_MEM,
> + .regshift = 2,
> + .uartclk = OMAP24XX_BASE_BAUD * 16,
> }, {
> +#else
> .flags = 0
> +#endif
> }
> };
You dropped the terminator entry (flags == 0) in the OMAP4 case. That
should remain the last entry whether or not OMAP4 support is enabled.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
