On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 12:05:07PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > > > On 02/09/2017 07:45 PM, David Miller wrote: > >From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 00:54:24 +0200 > > > >>On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 05:21:26PM -0500, David Miller wrote: > >>>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 02:07:34 +0200 > >>> > >>>>These two patches fix suspend/resume chain. > >>> > >>>Patch 2 doesn't apply cleanly to the 'net' tree, please > >>>respin this series. > >> > >>Strange, I've just checked it on net-next/master, it was applied w/o any > >>warnings. > > > >It makes no sense to test "net-next" when I am telling you that it is > >the "net" tree it doesn't apply to. > > > >This is a bug fix, so it should be targetting the "net" tree. > > > > Looks like the first fix is for net, but the second one is for net-next > I do not see > 03fd01ad0eead23eb79294b6fb4d71dcac493855 > "net: ethernet: ti: cpsw: don't duplicate ndev_running" > in net. There is dependency, both for net-next and only first is for net tree > > -- > regards, > -grygorii -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
