* Bin Liu <b-liu@xxxxxx> [170120 09:24]:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 08:56:46AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> [170119 06:09]:
> > > The DMA may hung up if a teardown is initiated while an endpoint is still
> > > active (Advisory 2.3.27 of DA8xx errata).
> > > To workaround this issue, add a delay before to initiate the teardown.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h | 1 +
> > > drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c | 4 ++++
> > > 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
> > > index 5f50a78..8c9850c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/da8xx.c
> > > @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ da8xx_dma_controller_create(struct musb *musb, void __iomem *base)
> > > #endif
> > >
> > > static const struct musb_platform_ops da8xx_ops = {
> > > - .quirks = MUSB_INDEXED_EP | MUSB_DMA_CPPI41,
> > > + .quirks = MUSB_INDEXED_EP | MUSB_DMA_CPPI41 | MUSB_DA8XX,
> > > .init = da8xx_musb_init,
> > > .exit = da8xx_musb_exit,
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> > > index ade902e..d129278 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.h
> > > @@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct musb_io;
> > > */
> > > struct musb_platform_ops {
> > >
> > > +#define MUSB_DA8XX BIT(7)
> > > #define MUSB_DMA_UX500 BIT(6)
> > > #define MUSB_DMA_CPPI41 BIT(5)
> > > #define MUSB_DMA_CPPI BIT(4)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c
> > > index 1fe7eae..d371d05 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_cppi41.c
> > > @@ -554,6 +554,10 @@ static int cppi41_dma_channel_abort(struct dma_channel *channel)
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > + /* DA8xx Advisory 2.3.27: wait 250 ms before to start the teardown */
> > > + if (musb->io.quirks & MUSB_DA8XX)
> > > + mdelay(250);
> > > +
> > > tdbit = 1 << cppi41_channel->port_num;
> > > if (is_tx)
> > > tdbit <<= 16;
> >
> > How about replace the do while loop calling dmaengine_terminate_all() with
> > deferred work doing that?
>
> It would be great, but it seems a little hard to implement. If the
> _abort is initiated by application due to transfer timeout, the
> application might immediately retry the transfer, then the driver would
> have to ensure the deferred work is done and the channel is free by that
> time.
>
> I guess we have to evaluate the impact of the do-while loop and the
> performance impact of the deferred work to know if it is worth it.
>
> >
> > That way it's more generic as it seems there's no hurry doing that
> > after the musb registers are cleared. That would also allow getting rid of
> > the two current udelay() calls there that also seems nasty.
>
> I don't think replacing the do-while loop will allow to get rid of the
> two udelay() calls, which are there as barriers for the register changes
> - clearing MUSB_RXCSR_DMAENAB and flushing FIFO.
OK fine with me.
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
