Hi Joao, On Monday 16 January 2017 10:31 PM, Joao Pinto wrote: > > Hi, > > Às 10:13 AM de 1/16/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu: >> + Joao, Jingoo >> >> Hi, >> >> On Monday 16 January 2017 03:01 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>> Hi Kishon, >>> >>>> Hi Łukasz, >>>> >>>> On Monday 16 January 2017 12:19 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>>>> Hi Kishon, >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday 15 January 2017 06:49 PM, Lukasz Majewski wrote: >>>>>>> Some devices (due to e.g. bad PCIe signal integrity) require to >>>>>>> run with forced GEN1 speed on PCIe bus. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch changes the speed explicitly on dra7 based devices when >>>>>>> proper device tree attribute is defined for the PCIe controller. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@xxxxxxx> >>>>>> >>>>>> Bjorn has already queued a patch to do the same thing >>>>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.kernel.org_cgit_linux_kernel_git_helgaas_pci.git_log_-3Fh-3Dpci_host-2Ddra7xx&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=zD82T5n4WcL7Ga-NSY2NI7KE75xQ99hN-mW2yX46wQk&s=E8zk1CbKxGH-f3fw_WpXxFU-A8BLkgA8NusCaxk1SvA&e= >>>>> >>>>> It seems like Bjorn only modifies CAP registers. >>>> >>>> The patch also modifies the LNKCTL2 register. >>>>> >>>>> He also needs to change register with 0x080C offset to actually >>>>> ( PCIECTRL_PL_WIDTH_SPEED_CTL ) >>>> >>>> This bit is used to initiate speed change (after the link is >>>> initialized in GEN1). Resetting the bit (like what you have done >>>> here) prevents speed change. >>> >>> This is strange, but e2e advised me to do things as I did in the patch >>> to _force_ GEN1 operation on PCIe2 port [1] (AM5728) >>> >>> Link: >>> [1] https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__e2e.ti.com_support_arm_sitara-5Farm_f_791_t_566421&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=s2fO0hii0OGNOv9qQy_HRXy-xAJUD1NNoEcc3io_kx0&m=zD82T5n4WcL7Ga-NSY2NI7KE75xQ99hN-mW2yX46wQk&s=uXLwglyRYqKpwp1JSxkOWmKpQ2wjfhgofpm8DCfquNw&e= >>> >>> Both patches modify 0x5180 007C register to set GEN1 capability >>> (PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB) >>> >>> The problem is with second register (in your patch): >>> >>> From SPRUHZ6G TRM: >>> >>> PCIECTRL_EP_DBICS_LNK_CAS_2 (0x5180 00A0) >>> - TRGT_LINK_SPEED (Reset 0x1) - "Target Link Speed" - no more >>> description in TRM >>> >>> It is set to PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_SLS_2_5GB = 0x1, which is the same as >>> default /reset value. >> >> The default value is 0x2 (or else none of the cards would have enumerated in GEN2) >>> >>> >>> Could you clarify which way to _force_ PCIe GEN1 operation is correct? >>> Mine shows differences in lspci output (as posted in [1]). >> >> You'll see the difference even with the patch in Bjorn's tree ;-) >> >> I think these are 2 different approaches to keep the link at GEN1. Joao or >> Jingoo, do you have any suggestion here? > > I studied the Databook, and both approaches seem to be right, dependently of the > Core configuration and setup. > > The standard manual speed change sequence is: > a) Write to PCIE_CAP_TARGET_LINK_SPEED (indicating desired speed) > b) Clear "Directed Speed Change" > c) Set "Directed Speed Change" > > If "Directed Speed Change" is set (DEFAULT_GEN2_SPEED_CHANGE is the default > value), it will execute LTSSM to initiate speed change to Gen2 or Gen3, after > link is started in Gen1, and then the bit is automatically cleared. > > Lukasz is reseting this bit, in order to avoid the LTSSM to be executed, which > is correct. There is another way to prevent this automatic speed change, which > is to set GEN1 speed before link up which might be difficult in some setups, so > Kishon's also right. Just for my understanding, why do you think this will be difficult in some setups? > > In my opinion Lukasz approach would be the one that might be more universal and > more "secure". IMHO setting link control in the standard PCIe header space should be more universal. I'm not sure about the secure part though. Thanks Kishon > > Joao > > >> >>> >>>> >>>> IMO the better way is to set the LNKCTL2 to GEN1 instead of hacking >>>> the IP register. >>> >>> From the original patch description: >>> >>> "Add support to force Root Complex to work in GEN1 mode if so desired, >>> but don't force GEN1 mode on any board just yet." >>> >>> Are there any (floating around) patches allowing forcing GEN1 operation >>> on any board (I would like to reuse/port them to my current solution)? >> >> For setting to GEN1 mode, "max-link-speed" should be set to 1 in dt with the >> patch in Bjorn's tree. >> >> Thanks >> Kishon >> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
