Currently when CPU_THERMAL is not defined the thermal sensors are not even exposed consequently no cooling is possible. CPU_THERMAL eventually depends on CPUFREQ. CPPUFREQ is not the only cooling for CPU. The thermal shutdown for critical temperatures is another cooling solution which will currently not get enabled if CPU_THERMAL is not defined. Remove this dependency so as to have the last level of thermal protection working even without CPUFREQ defined. Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> --- drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig index ea8283f..fe0e877 100644 --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL config TI_THERMAL bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support" depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL - depends on CPU_THERMAL help If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor. -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
