[PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Remove CPU_THERMAL Dependency from TI_THERMAL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Currently when CPU_THERMAL is not defined the thermal sensors
are not even exposed consequently no cooling is possible. CPU_THERMAL
eventually depends on CPUFREQ. CPPUFREQ is not the only cooling
for CPU.

The thermal shutdown for critical temperatures is another
cooling solution which will currently not get enabled if CPU_THERMAL
is not defined. Remove this dependency so as to have the last level
of thermal protection working even without CPUFREQ defined.

Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx>
---
 drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
index ea8283f..fe0e877 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/Kconfig
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ config TI_SOC_THERMAL
 config TI_THERMAL
 	bool "Texas Instruments SoCs thermal framework support"
 	depends on TI_SOC_THERMAL
-	depends on CPU_THERMAL
 	help
 	  If you say yes here you want to get support for generic thermal
 	  framework for the Texas Instruments on die bandgap temperature sensor.
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux