Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: cppi41: Fix oops in cppi41_runtime_resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@xxxxxx> [170112 15:43]:
> @@ -457,38 +449,36 @@ static void push_desc_queue(struct cppi41_channel *c)
>         cppi_writel(reg, cdd->qmgr_mem + QMGR_QUEUE_D(c->q_num));
>  }
>  
> -static void pending_desc(struct cppi41_channel *c)
> +static void cppi41_dma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
>  {
> +       struct cppi41_channel *c = to_cpp41_chan(chan);
>         struct cppi41_dd *cdd = c->cdd;
> +       int error;
> +       struct cppi41_channel *_c;
>         unsigned long flags;
>  
>         spin_lock_irqsave(&cdd->lock, flags);
>         list_add_tail(&c->node, &cdd->pending);
> -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdd->lock, flags);
> -}
> -
> -static void cppi41_dma_issue_pending(struct dma_chan *chan)
> -{
> -       struct cppi41_channel *c = to_cpp41_chan(chan);
> -       struct cppi41_dd *cdd = c->cdd;
> -       int error;
>  
>         error = pm_runtime_get(cdd->ddev.dev);
> -       if ((error != -EINPROGRESS) && error < 0) {
> +       if (error < 0) {
>                 pm_runtime_put_noidle(cdd->ddev.dev);
>                 dev_err(cdd->ddev.dev, "Failed to pm_runtime_get: %i\n",
>                         error);
> -
> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cdd->lock, flags);
>                 return;
>         }
>  
> -       if (likely(pm_runtime_active(cdd->ddev.dev)))
> -               push_desc_queue(c);
> -       else
> -               pending_desc(c);
> +       if (!cdd->is_suspended) {
> +               list_for_each_entry_safe(c, _c, &cdd->pending, node) {
> +                       push_desc_queue(c);
> +                       list_del(&c->node);
> +               };
> +       }
>  
>         pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(cdd->ddev.dev);
>         pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(cdd->ddev.dev);
> +       spin_lock_irqsave(&cdd->lock, flags);
>  }

So always add to the queue no matter, then always flush the queue
directly if active? Yeah that might work :)

Don't we need spinlock in the list_for_each_entry_safe() to prevent
it racing with runtime_resume() though?

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Arm (vger)]     [ARM Kernel]     [ARM MSM]     [Linux Tegra]     [Linux WPAN Networking]     [Linux Wireless Networking]     [Maemo Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Trails]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux