On 11/29/2016 04:11 AM, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 05:03:32PM -0600, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> +static int cpts_of_parse(struct cpts *cpts, struct device_node *node)
>> +{
>> + int ret = -EINVAL;
>> + u32 prop;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpts_clock_mult", &prop))
>> + goto of_error;
>> + cpts->cc_mult = prop;
>
> Why not set cc.mult here at the same time?
The same reason as in prev patch - cpts->cc_mult is original/initial mult
value loaded from DT (or calculated), while cc.mult is dynamic value
which can be changed as part of freq adjustment.
>
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "cpts_clock_shift", &prop))
>> + goto of_error;
>> + cpts->cc.shift = prop;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +of_error:
>> + dev_err(cpts->dev, "CPTS: Missing property in the DT.\n");
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>
--
regards,
-grygorii
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
