Hi, On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 02:55 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > Hi Nicolae, > > [auto build test ERROR on omap/for-next] > [also build test ERROR on v4.9-rc6] > [cannot apply to next-20161125] > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a > note to help improve the system] > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Nicolae-Rosia/mfd-tw > l-improvements-and-new-regulator-driver/20161127-022201 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux- > omap.git for-next > config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config) > compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901 > reproduce: > # save the attached .config to linux build tree > make ARCH=i386 > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > In file included from drivers/regulator/twl6032-regulator.c:11:0: > > > drivers/regulator/twl6032-regulator.c:557:31: error: > > > 'twl6032_regulator_driver_ids' undeclared here (not in a > > > function) > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, twl6032_regulator_driver_ids); > ^ > include/linux/module.h:213:21: note: in definition of macro > 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' > extern const typeof(name) > __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \ > ^~~~ > > > include/linux/module.h:213:27: error: > > > '__mod_platform__twl6032_regulator_driver_ids_device_table' > > > aliased to undefined symbol 'twl6032_regulator_driver_ids' > > extern const typeof(name) > __mod_##type##__##name##_device_table \ > ^ > > > drivers/regulator/twl6032-regulator.c:557:1: note: in expansion > > > of macro 'MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE' > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, twl6032_regulator_driver_ids); > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > vim +/twl6032_regulator_driver_ids +557 drivers/regulator/twl6032- > regulator.c > > 551 > 552 static const struct of_device_id twl6032_dt_match[] = { > 553 { .compatible = "ti,twl6032-regulator" }, > 554 { /* last entry */ } > 555 }; > 556 > > 557 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, > twl6032_regulator_driver_ids); > 558 > 559 static struct platform_driver twl6032_regulator_driver > = { > 560 .driver = { Thanks, I did not notice this since I was only testing using built-in module. I will wait for comments before sending V2, untill then here's an inline patch with the fix. Best regards, Nicolae ��.n��������+%������w��{.n�����{�������ܨ}���Ơz�j:+v�����w����ޙ��&�)ߡ�a����z�ޗ���ݢj��w�f
