On 27-10-16, 16:41, Dave Gerlach wrote: > Some TI SoCs, like those in the AM335x, AM437x, DRA7x, and AM57x families, > have different OPPs available for the MPU depending on which specific > variant of the SoC is in use. This can be determined through use of the > revision and an eFuse register present in the silicon. Introduce a > ti-cpufreq driver that can read the aformentioned values and provide > them as version matching data to the opp framework. Through this the > opp-supported-hw dt binding that is part of the operating-points-v2 > table can be used to indicate availability of OPPs for each device. > > This driver also creates the "cpufreq-dt" platform_device after passing > the version matching data to the OPP framework so that the cpufreq-dt > handles the actual cpufreq implementation. Even without the necessary > data to pass the version matching data the driver will still create this > device to maintain backwards compatibility with operating-points v1 > tables. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach@xxxxxx> > --- > v2-v3: > - Use common ti compatible as described in binding and then match > against machine type for platform data. > - Use newly exposed dev_pm_opp_of_get_opp_desc_node to get > operating-points-v2 table now that properties needed by driver are > there. > - Parse syscon properties from operating-points-v2 node rather > than cpu node. > - Do not make ti-cpufreq a module-platform-driver and do not allow > building as module. > > drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig.arm | 11 ++ > drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c | 288 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 300 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/cpufreq/ti-cpufreq.c Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
